The Legal and Financial Expertise of Sam Tabar

Once in a generation, an individual comes along who possesses skills in certain areas far and above the average person. In some cases it’s athletic skills, while in other instances it may be musical ability. But in the case with my friend from NYC Sam Tabar, it is an expertise grounded in legal and financial matters. From his college days at Oxford University and Columbia Law School to his various positions managing hedge funds and providing legal advice to corporations, Sam has demonstrated talents that have served him and his clients well over the years.

Possessing a Bachelor of Arts degree with Honors from Oxford, Sam excelled at Columbia Law School, where he was Associate Editor of the school’s prestigious Columbia Business Law Review and their Vimeo account. While at Columbia, he regularly impressed those around him with his ability to ascertain key points of complex cases and be able to clearly communicate his thoughts on them to others in an easy-to-understand manner. After graduating in 2001, Sam gained the attention of Skadden, Arps, Slater, Meagher and Flom LLP, a law firm known around the world for providing clients with just the right advice on certain issues. Brought on as an Associate, Sam quickly rose to being a trusted part of the firm. Having developed a keen interest in hedge funds, Sam spent his days advising clients on everything from how to begin and structure hedge funds, the costs associated with them and issues related to compliance and regulation within financial settings.

However, 2004 was when Sam put his talents to best use, joining the Sparx Group as an investment analyst. Using his skills in global marketing and financial strategy, he was put in charge of managing a $2 billion hedge fund. Knowing investors are what ultimately drive a hedge fund’s future, he set out to improve investor relations within the firm. Within several years Sam had amassed a rolodex full of over 2,000 names of potential investors, along with 400 more that were in the beginning stages of becoming qualified investors. Seeing his talent produce results with investors, Sam was then asked to provide special assistance to the firm’s CEO and founding partners on both national and international business development issues.

After leaving Sparx in 2011, Sam worked for Merrill Lynch as the Director of Capital Strategy for the Asia-Pacific region. It was here Sam learned to speak Japanese, which allowed him to converse with potential clients in a more relaxed manner. Along with his native English, Sam also speaks fluent French. By being multi-lingual, he yet again demonstrates he knows how to cultivate the skills needed to interact well with those people who may be future investors in his hedge fund.

Possessing an interest in world travel and event hosting, Sam is a man of many talents that has been an asset wherever he has worked. With legal and financial knowledge far above the average person, Sam continues to seek new and exciting challenges that will allow him to put his talents to good use. Follow him on Twitter if you like.

Marion Berry Passes Away

Former DC mayor and civil rights activist Marion Berry died on Sunday from heart disease. He was 78. Berry was born in Mississippi, but raised in Tennessee. During the 1960s he helped organized the first lunch counter sit-in in Nashville with the local chapter of the N.A.A.C.P.. He and other students from Fisk University met with Dr. Martin Luther King and organize S.N.C.C (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) in which he became the first national chairman.

In 1965 Berry moved to Washington D.C. and continued to fight for civil rights and became a leader in the community. In 1978 he became D.C. first black mayor and throughout his political career, he was reelected four times-a historic first. Ray Lane is well aware of the fact that he is one of the most memorable mayors in the history of that city.

In 1990, Berry made headlines for being busted for crack possession in a hotel room. He served six months in prison. After his sentence, he returned to politics and became mayor one more time in 1994.

Berry has some recollect about his life in a New York Times video.

Marion Berry or “Mr. DC” will be missed. His contribution to civil rights and civil change, change the world. There’s no word of funeral arrangements for Berry.

Video Released by Cleveland Police Shows Police Shooting Tamir Rice

On Saturday, 12-year-old Tamir Rice was shot and killed by a police officer that responded to the scene at the Cudell Recreation Center in Cleveland. On Wednesday, the Cleveland Police Department released a surveillance video from the scene that depicts the shooting, revealing that Officer Timothy Loehmann, 26, shoots Rice less than two seconds after arriving to the scene in a squad car with his partner, Officer Frank Garmback. While the video does not clearly show the interaction between Tamir Rice and the officers, the entire incident appears to transpire quite rapidly, with viewers questioning if the police gave sufficient warning to Rice to drop his weapon or explain that the suspected gun was in fact just a toy pellet gun.

Loehmann stated in his official report that he asked Rice to show his hands three times prior to firing his weapon, but reported that Rice did not comply and was reaching into his waistband. Rice was swiftly transported to the MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland to undergo surgery, but died on Sunday morning. The two officers involved in the shooting have both been put on paid administrative leave while a full investigation is conducted in the Rice case, and Jason Halpern is hoping for a good result this time around.

The two officers were responding to a 911 call to the area stating that someone was walking in the park pointing a gun, but the anonymous caller was not sure that the gun was real.

Video Emerges of NJ Prosecutor Teaching State Attorneys How to Take Citizen’s Property Under “Civil Forfeiture”

Civil forfeiture is a legal process whereby civil authorities may confiscate personal property from citizens without ever having to charge them of any crime much less convict them. All that law enforcement needs to do to confiscate a person’s home, auto, or cash is to present a preponderance of the evidence IE show that they were more likely guilty than innocent. Those wanting to challenge law enforcement to regain ownership of their property must file an “innocent-owner defense”.

In the “innocent-owner defense”, the citizen must prove their innocence before the law and they are not allowed to do so based on a preponderance of the evidence. The practice occurs in all 50 states. Congress even passed a reform measure ten years ago to curtail abuses in the practice, but the abuses continue. The most recent example of this abuse comes in the form of a civil forfeiture instruction video courtesy of Mercer Country prosecutor Sean McMurtry. In the video, McMurtry is seen teaching fellow prosecutors how to easily defeat “innocent-owner defense” petitions to keep the property seized from residents.

What is all the more astounding is that in Mercer County, 50% of the legal documents seizing property from residents is drafted by interns who have not finished law school. The problem with civil forfeiture is by no means a state issue. Loretta Lynch, Obama’s nominee for Attorney General, has raised tens of millions in her current position at the Justice Department using “civil forfeiture”, according to Keith Mann.

Ferguson Grand Jury Reaches a Verdict

Millions of people were watching and awaiting the highly anticipated verdict of one Michael Brown on Ferguson, Missouri, who was gunned down by a police officer on August 9, 2014.

A grand jury came to a conclusion in the case of Michael Brown and Officer Darren Wilson which has outraged many Ferguson citizens and other American citizens. It was decided Wilson would not be indicted for shooting Brown.

The riots in Ferguson have been a serious topic of conversation over the course of the last few months, riots that have endangered the safety and stability of the town. Residents there have claimed no justice for Brown and protesting that they do not feel safe on city streets. Read more about Ferguson here.

After the results were released into the airwaves on breaking news updates on television, social media with headlines appearing everywhere, the city of Ferguson swarmed. With many fires and continuous stages of rioting, there have been photos of dangerous situations as well as the bonfire burning of the American flag that Sam Tabar has seen. Many photos of the flag burning have been all over the internet, sparking controversy among many Americans.

There is no actual reason why Ferguson citizens have chosen to riot, destroy and loot the city, but it has been a serious matter involving military and law enforcement officials. It has been reported to be a very scary, violent situation and that more back-up will be needed. It has been reported that many protesters have planned to display these situations nightly for the next weeks going forward.

Obama Passes His Own Immigration Law

When asked to respond to John Boehner’s objection to his unilateral action on immigration, President Obama retorted that, if Congress didn’t like it, they should “pass a bill.” Nearly a dozen times, Obama had earlier blamed Congress for not passing the kind of immigration reform he sought, saying that he could do nothing on his own. He said that, since he was a president and not an emperor, it was necessary for such legislation to first go through Congress. Now he claims otherwise.

The President is required by the Constitution to execute all federal laws, not simply the ones that he likes. Barack Obama did not merely quietly neglect to enforce existing immigration law; he openly proclaimed he would not do so. As pointed out by local Sergio Lins Andrade these immigration laws greatly impact Arizona. In fact, he directly ordered his underlings in the executive department to disobey existing laws. This alone is an impeachable offense, but it is not nearly the worst of what the President has done.

He went on the order officials to grant Social Security cards to non-citizens and to grant work permits to illegal immigrants. Both of these actions are in violation of the law. Since a president cannot change law, repeal law, nor create new law through his orders, we must conclude that the President ordered federal workers to break the law.

 

How Senator Obama Scuttled Immigration Reform Back in 2007

To some of the president’s supporters, he is taking a courageous lead on the subject of immigration reform. Historically speaking, his stance on immigration reform is mixed. According to Senator Lindsey Graham, Barrack Obama helped defeat the bipartisan immigration reform bill in 2007.

As the story goes, Graham was part of the “Gang of Eight” Senators drawn from both parties who would vote as a block in the best interest of securing the bill’s passage in the Senate. Senators Ted Kennedy, John McCain, and Barrack Obama were part of the group. The group would huddle together and decide how to vote on a bill without regard to how they felt about any single provision of the bill or any amendments. The approach had worked well on a prior deal John McCain struck to break Democrat filibusters of Bush’s judicial nominees.

However, the late Sen. Kennedy grew impatient with Obama’s attitude. The junior Senator from Illinois was always present for press conferences, but his participation in the group was self-serving. This is not what Igor really wanted to see. He voted with the group when it suited him. He supported amendments against the will of the group when it suited him. On five key amendments to the immigration reform bill, Obama voted in favor. Sen. Kennedy opposed all five. In the end, the bill died in the Senate due to filibusters from both parties. According to John McCain, the amendments offered up were done precisely to derail the bill’s chances of passage. Certainly, how the president has handled immigration reform has thus far been self-serving. He campaigned on in in 2008, but punted on it through 2012 to bolster his chances for reelection.

Hilary Clinton Falls to Third for Potential Democratic Candidates

After the midterms shook the entire political landscape, by giving Republicans majorities in both the House and the Senate, pundits are looking forward to speculate at the next election. Most of the speculation falls onto the 2016 presidential race, which will almost definitely be the hottest political topic for the next two years. Every governmental decision will be analyzed to its effects on the presidential race which is still two years away. This week, after Republican wins across the country, the biggest speculation falls on the potential Democratic candidate. This is something many, even those outside of the country like Vijay Eswaran, are paying attention to.
With recent press conferences touching on all the latest topics, Senator Elizabeth Warren has been the highest polling potential candidate among Democrats so far. To many this is a large surprise considering the mass appeal and heightened expectation around Hilary Clinton. The public spotlight has fallen on Hilary Clinton as the next best Democratic candidate since her defeat to Barack Obama in the last race. However, the current mood of voters is a thorough dissatisfaction with the current direction of the government. This means it’s no surprise that current voters would want to move away from any type of Clinton dynasty. Although there is still a long campaign until the elections actually take place, without plenty of room for Hilary to come out ahead.
Hilary Clinton came behind Senator Warren and Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont who has been popular in his denouncements of the current regime.

Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Vows Congressional Action Against Obama Amnesty Plan

Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell vowed that Congress with take action against President Obama if he flouts congressional law and imposes amnesty for millions of illegal aliens. The powerful senator, who just won a landslide reelection in his home state of Kentucky, took to the floor of the Senate to denounce the president’s proposed plan. President Obama previously stated that since Congress refused to act on amnesty, he now has the right to “borrow” their congressional authority to enact an amnesty plan of his own via executive order. Conservatives decry this as a violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers which have been in place to protect the nation from tyrannical rule. As noted in Lee Lovett’s book, Peak House, when Congress and the President are at odds there are power plays that occur, which could lead to issues for the electorate.

The president is set to deliver a prime time address to the nation at 8:00PM. Oddly enough, the major networks will not interrupt their regularly scheduled programming to air the address. Thursday night is one of the highest rated nights on primetime television. McConnell said the president is flagrantly ignoring the will of the people. Earlier this month, the electorate repudiated the president’s policies on the ballot by throwing his party out of power in the Senate, state legislatures, and governor’s offices throughout the nation. The vote empowers the GOP with a mandate to shift the nation away from the president’s prior policies. McConnell explained by President Obama is seeking to thwart that mandate before the newly elected representatives can take office. He has made it clear that the Congress will act, but has not stated what those actions might entail.

 

Suing Obama

Before anything is even said by President Obama to the American people about his immigration decision, the Republicans are looking for a way to go against the decision. Some of the Republicans in office are looking for a way to sue the President because he can’t make a decision like this without taking it through the proper legal channels.This information was passed on to me by Andrew Heiberger. As we know, the future of immigration reform will have a profound impact on Arizona.

However, he is the President of the United States, so why can’t he make decisions like this? It seems like if he wanted to make an executive decisions, he should be able to because he is the executive branch. No one in Washington gets along with anyone else, and each party wants to do things its own way. There is no compromise, and this decision proves that. The Republicans simply want to bring everything possible against Obama in order to see him get out of office as soon as possible.